The phenomenon of outsourcing, otherwise known as “outsourcing”, is a sensitive subject in American politics. Politicians and economists aim to influence American companies to increase their revenues through outsourcing. On the other hand, there are those who oppose outsourcing, equivalent to outsourcing, as a source of wealth. However, should outsourcing always involve a foreign country? Let’s take a look.
Between outsourcing and offshore…
The concepts of outsourcing and offshoring are often used interchangeably, but it is important to know the difference between these two concepts. Outsourcing involves hiring a third party to manufacture a product or provide a service that the company manufactured or provided itself. When a startup or small business uses a third-party company to manage its benefits and human resources, it is called outsourcing. When a consumer uses a service like TaskRabbit to hire someone to perform a service, that is also outsourcing. So, you can outsource to US-based companies or individuals. It should be mentioned that outsourcing does not necessarily have to involve foreign suppliers of goods and services.
However, some companies outsource to foreign countries. For example, an American automobile company may manufacture cars in the United States that use parts made in Mexico. The manufacture of these parts has been outsourced to a Mexican company. But when a company outsources, it transfers some of its activities to another country. Thus, if the same American car manufacturer opened its own factory in Mexico, it would be a relocation. If a company opens call centres in other countries, this is also offshoring. In most American political dialogue, people use the term “outsourcing” to mean either outsourcing to a foreign company or offshoring – or both.
So what are the pros and cons of outsourcing? Analyse the following list:
1st advantage: outsourcing can increase a company’s income
Businesses usually make the decision to outsource the production of goods and services if they think it can save them money and, therefore, increase their revenue. The most frequently encountered example concerns the cost of labour. Companies can outsource and/or relocate to a country where labor costs are lower. While some may view the loss of local jobs as a negative effect of outsourcing, it is difficult for companies to resist the increased profits that may result. Companies can also outsource to avoid the expense of training and hiring all employees in-house or to grow their business.
2nd advantage: outsourcing can enhance economic efficiency
Companies sometimes outsource because of the opportunity costs of producing a good or service on their own. For example, the CEO of a tech start-up may outsource HR because he feels meeting venture capitalists and advancing his tech team would be more valuable than managing employee benefits. . When highly skilled people can outsource low-value tasks and spend more time on high-value tasks, companies tend to benefit. Proponents of outsourcing claim that it can also increase the overall efficiency of the economy by distributing tasks to people who have the appropriate skill level for those tasks and allowing highly skilled workers to be more productive.
3rd advantage: outsourcing can influence the phenomenon of “job export” from highly developed countries to developing countries
Some proponents of outsourcing explain that outsourcing to foreign countries (and offshoring) has been shown to result in the loss of some American jobs, but less-developed nations benefit and these benefits outweigh the benefits. costs for rich countries like the United States. Americans might object, they say, but outsourcing can lead to higher wages and more job opportunities in developing countries to which American companies relocate. Some analysts see this as an advantage, saying that over time it can narrow the gap between rich and poor countries.
4th advantage: outsourcing can consolidate international links
For some experts, the more countries trade with each other, the less likely they are to go to war and the more easily they can cooperate in achieving common goals. To the extent that outsourcing strengthens relationships between companies in two or more countries, it can also strengthen relationships between the governments of those countries.
1st disadvantage: loss of jobs in the United States
The most publicized downside of outsourcing is the loss of jobs in the United States or any other country that outsources. The fact that workers in other countries can benefit from employment opportunities they did not have before is not of great comfort to members of American manufacturing communities, for example, hard hit by the closures. of factories.
2nd disadvantage: the lack of transparency
Increasingly, consumers want to know where their products come from and who made them. Outsourcing makes this kind of transparency difficult. An American company can subcontract part of its activities to a company located, for example, in Bangladesh, which can also subcontract to another company in Bangladesh for the recruitment of personnel. So, if workers in a factory in Bangladesh are working in unsafe conditions, is it the fault of the recruiting company, the manufacturing company in Bangladesh, the US garment company, or all three? So, in conclusion, it can be said that with outsourcing, it is more difficult to track money and labor to better understand the supply chain of a company.
3rd disadvantage: labor and environmental standards may regress
Some critics of outsourcing say it leads to a general loosening of labor and environmental standards that apply to goods as well as services consumed by Americans. This is a criticism often cited by opponents of NAFTA*. If a U.S. company outsources its operations to a country with lower wages, laxer labor laws, or less stringent environmental standards, the resulting good or service may not meet the standards that the US government has agreed to apply in our country. It’s not just a problem for American consumers who want reassurance about where their products come from. It’s also a problem for workers in other countries who can’t get the wages they need to succeed, and for communities that feel the impact of pollution overseas. Furthermore, the net contribution to climate change increases if more goods are produced in countries with lower environmental standards.
NAFTA* North American Free Trade Agreement
4th disadvantage: the outsourcing company and financial losses
Outsourcing is not always synonymous with savings for the companies that practice it. They may find that the company they have outsourced to is not meeting deadlines, performing poorly, or having a negative effect on the business. There may be communication issues or costs may exceed expectations. For small businesses in particular, outsourcing can be a gamble.
Conclusion
Return on Investment (ROI) plans must be implemented effectively for enterprises and organizations in every sector. Resources and investments are optimized with the aid of ROI strategies, which also guarantee the intended outcomes. Organizations can assess the efficacy of their tactics and improve their approach for better results by establishing clear goals and tracking the results.
Organizations can develop a devoted client base and see sustainable growth in the long run by iterating on their strategy frequently and concentrating on providing value to their target audience. Businesses and organizations may maintain their competitiveness in today’s dynamic marketplace and find long-term success by putting in place strong ROI strategies.
Explore our Outstaffing Services to find out how we can help to grow your company much faster.
Scale together with Daily BPO!
